Archive for the ‘grammar police’ Category

Grammar Police, part X

posted: 03.12.09 at 09:30 PM
filed under: grammar police


"user s" is a rather mysterious name

The Grammar Police have issued an All Points Bulletin for the elusive “User s.”
Source: Instructions for television antenna from Radio Shack.

tags:

   permalink    1 comment


Grammar Police, part IX

posted: 03.01.09 at 10:45 PM
filed under: grammar police


Dr. Pepper feels vindicated.
Source: Hot dog stand in Waukegan, Illinois.

tags:

   permalink    0 comments


Grammar Police, part VIII

posted: 02.22.09 at 08:00 PM
filed under: grammar police


“I haven’t seen my name misspelled like that since medical school,” Dr. Pepper remarked.
Source: Jewels in Waukegan, Illinois.

tags:

   permalink    2 comments


Grammar Police, part VII

posted: 02.15.09 at 04:03 AM
filed under: grammar police


Incorrect use of plural forms is normally a misdemeanor offense. Charges for the owner of this sign were upgraded to a felony in light of the fact that the erroneous sign had been on display for over a year.
Source: Auto repair shop in Chicago.

tags:

   permalink    0 comments


Grammar Police, part VI

posted: 02.08.09 at 08:00 PM
filed under: grammar police


‘I’ Am! Hungry
Source: Bar in Chicago.

tags:

   permalink    1 comment


Grammar Police, part V

posted: 01.28.09 at 09:30 PM
filed under: grammar police


Confusing the words “you’re” and “your” is a felony offense. Thanks to the Grammar Police, charges have been filed against the owner of this sign.
Source: Hot dog stand in Chicago.

tags:

   permalink    1 comment


Grammar Police, part IV

posted: 01.21.09 at 08:00 PM
filed under: grammar police


Spelling errors also fall within the jurisdiction of the Grammar Police. Errors on mass-produced signs are particularly embarrassing. Eventually, they got it right.
Source: Laundromat in Chicago.
(Reader submission. Thank you, Colleen.)

tags:

   permalink    1 comment


Grammar Police, part III

posted: 01.05.09 at 09:00 PM
filed under: grammar police


I know what their intent was, but when your sign reads “RE’SUME’S,” you have entered the jurisdiction of the Grammar Police. Put your hands on the wall and spread ‘em.
Source: Storefront in Chicago.
(Reader submission. Thank you, Whorey Povich.)

tags:

   permalink    2 comments


Grammar Police, part II

posted: 12.28.08 at 09:00 PM
filed under: grammar police


Vegetables served to the tune of “Chopping Broccoli."
Source: Restaurant menu in Waukegan, Illinois.

tags:

   permalink    3 comments


Introducing the Grammar Police

posted: 12.20.08 at 09:57 PM
filed under: grammar police


You know what really grinds my gears? Poor grammar.

My beef is not limited to grammar; poor use of the English language simply pisses me off. While certain shortcuts are annoying but acceptable in casual communication, linguistic indiscretions are completely inappropriate in business communication.

Any time I read a sign that proclaims “SHOE’S, BUY TWO PAIRS, GET ONE FREE,” or an email warning that “Someone left they’re key’s in the conference room,” a little part of me dies.

If grammatical errors while speaking are a minor folly, the same errors in printed media should be considered a Cardinal sin. The permanence of the printed word can give an error a lasting legacy of ridicule. Some egregious offenses are even made famous by comedy hack Jay Leno’s “headlines” segment on The Tonight Show.

There is a duality in my emotions to poor grammar. While I scorn those who make the errors, mocking the errors gives me a perverse sense of delight.

Fortunately, there is no shortage of material to mock. There is a plentiful bounty of hand-lettered signs and cheesy junk mail circulars that were written at a third-grade level.

Without further ado, I am happy to present the first entry in this column.

The sign actually refers to the Sioux Indian Chief named “Barefeet”. He wrote several bad checks a few months back.
Source: Liquor store in Waukegan, Illinois.

tags:

   permalink    2 comments


    Newer Entries »